Blog Assignment #1: How Science Works
BLOG POST #1: HOW SCIENCE WORKS
Team members: Hazel Arman, Greyson Hamilton, Michelle Le, Eloina Rodriguez
Part 1: Take a photo of your group diagram on the whiteboard and post the answers to the following questions:.
- How did you start the scientific process? What are the similarities? What are the differences?
We started all of our individual diagrams with making an observation. We all had rather similar steps to the scientific process going in the order of questions, constructing a hypothesis, making predictions, gathering data/testing, making a conclusion, then theory. The main difference was some added a step about designing an experiment, while others had this implied. Only two of our group members had a step about refining the methods.
- Are the diagrams similar to each other? What are the major differences? What steps are only included on 1-2 of the student’s diagrams. Do you agree that this is a valid or important step?
The diagrams were quite similar to each other, all diagrams followed a general trend from making an observation to building a experiment based on questions, predictions, and a hypothesis. The main difference we saw in our group was the addition of a refinement step. It is important to have this step, as very few experiments are perfect in their first run, a step that refines or expands the experiment in the scientific process has the capability to provide a better outcome, encompass a broader scope of data, or be run more efficiently.
- Is there one diagram that stands out as being the most “correct” in terms of describing how you understand the scientific process?
Our group did not think that any of the diagrams were more “correct” than the rest, but by discussing our individual understanding of the scientific processes we were able to recognize the weaknesses in each of our diagrams.
- Was there anything that surprised you when looking at the diagrams drawn by your lab mates?
It was surprising that our major differences and disagreements were towards the last steps of our diagrams which mainly addressed how we would move forward or repeat our scientific process in the next trial.
Part 2: Try to reflect on your diagram and make at least one change based on your experience in lab today. Take another photo of your group diagram on the whiteboard with edits.
Answer the following questions:
- What change(s) did you decide to make and why?
We added the peer review to our diagram because the peer review process is integral to scholarly research. It is a process of subjecting research methods and findings to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field which is really important to use this method as part of a research.
- Did this lab today help you see how to approach your research project for the quarter?
Yes, it was helpful to review all the process again after a while and also as a group we had some discussion about some parts that we had some different opinion. For example, some of the members believed that observation should be after questions.
- What did you learn about the scientific process/how science works that you did not know or realize before?
I really like how you said that after looking at everyone's diagrams you were able to recognize the weaknesses in your individual ones because I can definitely identify with that. It was very interesting to see in which parts of the process I was more detailed in compared to others.
ReplyDeleteI also agree with Gretchen's comment on the weaknesses within each flow chart of the scientific process. I think its because everyone thinks in their own way, so when we come together over the same idea each mind contributes to the overall aspect, while adding their own little things that other people may not have thought about because of how they looked at the situation. With that I liked how you added in the last question that with the scientific process we need to go through peer review, because everyone thinks in their own way and that can help to make things make sense, or even add feedback the original person who worked on something may not have seen!
ReplyDeleteThis process of working as individuals and then working as a group to collaborate is a great example of why peer review is such an important step of the scientific process. Although ideas can be similar, it is important to discuss as a group and hear others opinions to round out rough edges to achieve the best results. Good job on adding this to your revision.
ReplyDeleteWhen you say refine methods, would you rewrite the experiment to get the results you were expecting?
Looking at your first diagram and then the revised one, I can see that the change you added earliest was the abstract. I think that is a great addition because we didn't even think about that on our diagram. However, I don't know about you guys but when we worked on lab reports in the previous classes, our group worked on the abstract last. We worked on it after we knew what the whole report looked like.
ReplyDeleteIn addition to weakness you can also see where each individual expresses more importance in the scientific process by the finer details they add to certain areas. It shows how those areas stand out to the individual.
ReplyDelete